Promise Media

Online Reporting and Analysis Improves with Multiple Sources

Stored in Marketing and tagged
Website analytics

Online reporting and analysis is as simple or complex as an site manager chooses to make it. They are simple with a single, shallow analytics report or complex with reports from multiple sources.

An accurate view of a website audience often comes from more than one source.

Some marketers struggle with accurate data about their Web audiences. They may use misleading software, interpret the numbers incorrectly or don’t spend enough time to understand them.

Part of the problem is caused by misunderstandings about what is being measured.

Another part of it is due to the numerous sources of information out there. Many of them disagree with each other.

Quantitative Measurements

Common quantitative measures come from raw site logs and Web analytic software such as Omniture, Quantcast or Google Analytics.

Google Analytics is the most widely used analytic package in digital media. It’s popular in part because it is free and in part because it provides a tremendous amount of information.

It looks at a site audience from a Google perspective. It is entirely quantitative, meaning that it provides numbers but not perceptions about a site’s brand.

As packages such as Google Analytics have grown in power, raw server logs via the likes of AWStats have declined. They often overestimate site traffic because they include:

  • A staff’s site production activity.
  • Files that don’t qualify as visitor page views such as headers and footers.
  • Oftentimes even scripts and iframe files.

But AWStats and others like it still provide some useful information. They include the IP addresses that send the largest numbers of visitors or non HTML file downloads of PDFs and other file formats.

Web analytics software is more reliable from the major, creditable providers such as Omniture and Google. It is less reliable when it is written from scratch and freely available from someone who may not have a good grounding in audience metrics.

Some sites use ad-serving reports as a secondary source of quantitative data about site traffic.

Qualitative Reporting and Analysis

Common qualitative sources include Scarborough, Nielsen NetRatings and Media Audit. These studies often involve researchers calling representative samples of people at home to ask them questions about Web usage.


Credit: Pixabay Creative Commons license

Experienced Web managers know that the data from online reporting and analysis is more useful for the demographic descriptions and especially the perceptions of a site’s audience rather than total site usage of unique visitors, frequency of visits and page views.

The demographic data works well in sales presentations. Total site usage is popular with senior management and industry reports.

A site such as Quantcast tries to bridge the gap between quantitative and qualitative audience measurements by trying to provide pure numbers as well as insights about branding.

Sites that use the Quantcast tag have reports that show shopping, media and political interests. They also estimate age, gender, education level, ethnicity, number of children in the household and affinity with other websites.

Such information is similar to what is provided by Scarborough, Nielsen and Media Audit. Whether it can capture the human nuances and flexibility of a phone or in-person interview remains unclear.

It is worth noting that Google Analytics is moving in that same direction. In any event, each source has a limited reliability with its data because of the way the data is collected.

Which Reporting to Use

Whether a business is small or large, there are times when it must provide online reporting and analysis for executives or owners if they care at all about the busines benefits of the site.

Some businesses even have to provide such reports to clients, such as media organizations that provide information to advertisers.

Presenters would be wise to use multiple sources rather than single sources for sales presentations and internal reporting. It is wiser still to provide context with each source.

Explain the difference between quantitative and qualitative sources. Don’t rely only on the highest number. Use averages over a period of time such as a quarter or the preceding three months rather than just a single month to smooth out the misleading highs and lows.

Credibility with management, shareholders and customers comes from averages, trends and multiple sources. It doesn’t come with a high single number that can’t be sustained or one source that may get it wrong next time.

Make a Comment, Ask a Question

© 2007-2024 Promise Media LLC • AdvertisePrivacyTerms of ServiceSitemap